Fred Wilson has an interesting discussion going on in response to his post, "Monetize the Audience, not the Content," Essentially, his point is that subscriptions are the answer. He points to FT.com where, according to him, they let you access for free until the 10th event. Then they require subscription. His most important point is a "frictionless" solution.
I pointed out that we have succeeded in generating interest in subscriptions by syndicating "teaser" content on contextually relevant sites that dynamically updates in real time what's happening.
I then responded to a comments about charging for news instead of archives. I agree that it is dysfunctional that news companies give away news for free and charge for archives. But, agreeing with Fred that charging for Breaking News is difficult, I point out that we have to consider all the competitors - including 24 hour news cable networks and radio - which are free. However, there are ways to add value. Later when Paul Smalera responded by clarifying, I responded to him by sharing the WSJ breaking news updates which I pay to have sent to my email/blackberry. Wanting to encourage a discussion about what consumers will pay for, I shared my observations about the free/ad supported business model: